Something’s been on my mind for a few semesters—maybe it’s time to reconsider policies regarding part-time students.
Why can part-timers have a 4.0 QPA and not be recognized or congratulated?
Why are some organizations not available to part-timers?
Why are there less scholarship opportunities?
I believe the difference in treatment is often based on the supposition that part-time students have it easier. I find that ridiculous. Just as it would be foolish to assume that all full-time students are challenged to the full, it is also silly to assume all part-time students are coasting. There are full-time students who just have to go to class. Others have to work a part-time job. Some have it really hard as they may have more than one job and carry responsibilities at home. But, this is the same with part-time students. Some part-timers have lots of free time and simply choose to take a class or two. But, many are people who have great demands on their time, working full-time jobs, caring for homes and family, and squeeze in classes, too.
Why not recognize and involve part-time students, at least on some sort of sliding scale? Maybe they can’t be on the usual Dean’s list, but why not a Part-time Students Dean’s list? Why not offer smaller scholarships for students carrying less classes? Or, maybe more scholarships could be offered based on financial need, including part-time students. And, if a program has requirements for full-time members such as hours of service, couldn’t the program allow part-time students in with a service requirement proportionate to a part-time schedule?
Separating students by the number of classes they are taking leaves the part-time students at a disadvantage. Hopefully, we’re all here to learn and experience as much of what the university offers as possible. It doesn’t seem fair or logical to exclude the part-time student who is often a non-traditional student just trying to get a quality education.
LaurelP